| Bodybuilding:
Groundless Theories That Can
Hamper Your Chest Growth
By Scott Abbett
I wonder how many of you reading this have used alternating dumbell
curls for your biceps. If so, let me ask you this: Have you ever
asked yourself why you do them? Think about it; you never perform
alternating repetitions for most other exercises. When was the last
time you did an alternating leg press, alternating leg extensions,
or alternating overhead triceps extensions? Probably never. Yet
it’s common to see people copying what they see others do
in performing alternating biceps curls. And since they’re
resting each arm while lifting the weight in the opposing arm, they’re
essentially doing a rest/pause between each repetition when performing
curls in this manner.
One day in the
gym, I asked a guy why he does alternating dumbell curls for his
biceps. I pointed out that there aren’t any other muscle groups
that get this alternating rest/pause treatment. What benefit was
each of his biceps getting from resting as much as five seconds
between repetitions? He just scratched his head and looked at the
floor. “I don’t know…” he said, smiling.
“I’ve never really thought about it”
And this brings
up my point. I’m not here to tell people they’re wrong
in doing alternating dumbell curls. I’m here to express that
they might be cutting themselves short in life when they go through
it “never really thinking about it”. We tend to do even
less thinking when we perceive the people we’re emulating
(like the BIG alternating dumbell curl guy) to be experts.
Here’s
something to ponder that’s a bit more consequential than whether
you alter your dumbell curls. Do you subscribe to the bodybuilding
theory that says you need to focus mostly on compound movements
to build size? You know the story: to build a big chest, your routine
needs to consist of mostly bench pressing – for bigger legs,
you’d better do a lot of squats. I’ve heard this over
and over again. But is it really true? I’ve gained my best
pectoral size after putting bench pressing routines on the back
burner in favor of flyes. And I’m not the only one; I first
became motivated to do it when I read an article many years ago
in which bodybuilding legend Scott Wilson said his chest only grew
when he dumped the excessive bench pressing.
Think about
it: Why would compound movements be better than isolation one’s
for building your body? Muscle growth occurs when you advance to
moving higher volumes of weight than you previously could. If that
happens while doing flat dumbell flyes for your chest, your pecs
will get bigger… period. Equally, if you train your chest
with bench pressing in a haphazard manner that leads to over-training,
your chest won’t get any bigger even though you opted for
bench pressing over flyes. It’s that simple.
Consider this:
let’s say for argument’s sake that your pectoral muscles
will move one third of the load when you’re bench pressing.
This sounds reasonable since the deltoids and triceps are heavily
called upon when performing upper body pressing movements. If you
can eke out ten repetitions of 225 pounds on the bench, you’d
move a total volume of 2,225 pounds but your pecs might have been
called upon for a third of that work; about 742 pounds.
It’s safe
to bet that a person who can do ten good reps with 225 on the bench
can also perform ten strict repetitions of flat bench dumbell flyes
with 50 pound dumbbells. However, those strict reps of dumbell flyes
would place a significantly greater volume demand directly on the
pectorals within the same time allotment required by the bench pressing.
The two fifty pound dumbells are a hundred pounds on the whole chest,
times ten equals a thousand. That’s a thousand pounds of volume
(thirty-five percent more than the bench pressing) placed almost
exclusively on the pec muscles.
Even if you
can only use forty pound dumbells for the flyes, you’ll still
beat the bench press for volume load on the pecs (800 lbs vs. 742
lbs). This assumes that your pectorals are indeed taking exactly
one-third of the stress during bench pressing. It could be more
than that or it could be a bit less; it depends much on the genetically-determined
structure of your upper body.
What’s
in a Hormone Spike?
Many compound
movement advocates site the theory that the body releases more anabolic
hormones when performing big movements like squats and bench presses.
To this assertion, I can pose three very good questions:
1. How much
additional testosterone can bench pressing produce over isolation
movements? (unless it’s huge amounts, it’s not going
to matter)
2. Does this
increase represent higher average levels of the hormone during recovery,
or is it only a spike during and directly after a workout? (don’t
buy the “two-hour window” theory)
3. All other
things considered – does it really matter?
Here’s
an even better question: If one guy does his bench pressing in a
wimpy manner and another guy does his flyes like his life depends
on it – who gets the best testosterone spike?
Another question:
Since sexual activity also spikes testosterone levels, does the
heavy flye user who has sex after his workout produce more testosterone
than the bench presser who doesn’t?
I think you
get my point. Natural testosterone ebbs and flows in everyone (women
too). It’s really the levels we average during our entire
recuperation period between workouts that matters. And how much
does that matter? If you average a few nanograms per decileter more
than I do, I’ll probably just take one more day off between
workouts and make just as much muscular gain as you.
Form Matters
on Flye Movements
To build your
chest with flyes, good form is absolutely essential. All too often,
I see people performing movements that resemble a sort of hybrid
between flyes and dumbell presses. These are about the most useless
things you can do for your pecs. Your elbows do need to be slightly
bent during flyes to prevent hyper-extending them. However, pivoting
at the elbows instead of the shoulders is just a sneaky way of deferring
or avoiding discomfort.
Let’s
face it, doing heavy flyes in a strict and disciplined manner is
painful. When relatively heavy dumbells are lowered with outstretched
arms until they’re horizontal and even with your head on the
bench, there’s a searing kind of stress throughout the chest
region. When you squeeze the muscles as you carefully arc the dumbells
upward and back together, the pain and positive effect from working
the pecs so directly is only intensified. This is a good indication
that you’re doing them correctly.
Conclusion
I currently
do only one compound movement during my chest workout and the rest
of it consists of flyes and pec-deck exercises. What’s more,
I do my bench pressing movement late in the workout so that my pectorals
have become somewhat pre-exhausted. This has all led to far greater
pectoral growth compared to the days when I did set after set of
flat and incline bench pressing.
If you’re
having trouble with pectoral growth, I suggest you try a flye and
pec-deck dominated workout routine. Let go of the erroneous belief
that these are “shaping exercises”. Consider this: Ray
“Thunder” Stern, a bodybuilder from the distant past,
had some of the best pectoral muscles I’ve ever seen when
he was at his peak. It was said by some of his friends that he could
perform incline dumbell flyes with a pair of 120-pound dumbells.
That’s incredible.
Impressive flye
movements will produce an impressive chest.
Scott Abbett
is the author of HardBody Success: 28 Principles to Create Your
Ultimate Body and Shape Your Mind for Incredible Success.
Scott is a certified
fitness trainer and a certified Master Practitioner and Trainer
of NLP. You can view his own physical transformation by visiting
http://www.hardbodysuccess.com
Article Source:
http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Scott_Abbett
|